Apropos to last week’s post on focused drinking, I decided that Riesling would be a logical place to experiment given that, over the past year I have, I’m embarrassed to say, dialed back the Riesling consumption. So, 2009 is supposed to be a terrific vintage for Riesling. Plenty ripe, I’m sure, as it was all over Europe, but likely producing many delicious wines to drink and age. I’m starting with the trocken (dry) styles, given that these are the wines I know the least, and that trocken wines in ripe vintages tend to be a pretty good combination.
There are four wines, tasted over the course of five days, which I will try to shed some light on here in three stages.
Day 1 – Introduction to the Trockens
I selected four wines priced from $14-$20:
2009 Josef Rosch Riesling Trocken
Very simple, ripe, stone fruit without a whole lot of interest texturally. One for uncritical drinking to sip without much thought or expecting much pleasure. Meh.
2009 Von Schubert Maximiner Herrenberg Riesling Trocken
Whoa – sulphuric funkiness on the nose. Slatey as well, that double Ruwer combo of slate and sulphur, I believe, is painfully bad in trocken form. Not a big fan. Also, some weird bitter cherry cough drop type aromas as well. Maybe will improve with some fridge time.
2009 Keller Estate Riesling Trocken
Soft, pure, poached pear and ripe orange citric deliciousness. The wine managed to be the ripest of the bunch, but still refreshing, balanced and mineral as well. At the time, I was thinking this to be texturally closer to demi-sec to sec tendre Loire chenin than to riesling.
2009 Okonomierat Rebholz Riesling Trocken.
Very compressed, tight, mineral, tangy and DRY. Sort of a greenish quality to it, with subtle citric and vege notes that brought lighter gruner veltliner to mind more than riesling. A tough one to initially guage.
Day 2 – Sunday lunch
A glass or 2 of wine with lunch is one of life’s simple pleasures which unfortunately so many of us stressed out, overworked Americans miss out on – regular wine drinkers included. Anyway, I continued to check the development of these wines, this time in a more leisurely format while enjoying my Sunday away from work.
2009 Josef Rosch Riesling Trocken
Improving. Firming up, brighter fruit and acidity, more focus. Let’s upgrade this one from “meh” to not bad.
2009 Von Schubert Maximiner Herrenberg Riesling Trocken
Still more ‘nast than Conde.
2009 Keller Estate Riesling Trocken
This was one of my two lunch glasses. Delicious but maybe starting to taste a little too ripe? Getting spicier and the texture, which I formerly though of as soft, is getting a little bit heavy and viscous. A glass was just the right amount.
2009 Okonomierat Rebholz Riesling Trocken
Markedly better. Fleshing out a bit, still showing wonderful minerality and bright, snappy citric fruits, but spreading throughout the palate more. At this point I am beginning to favor this one to the Keller.
Day 5 – Final Impressions
2009 Josef Rosch Riesling Trocken
Starting to lose some intensity and impact. Still, its not a bad drier Riesling for the masses.
2009 Von Schubert Maximiner Herrenberg Riesling Trocken
Nope. Never again.
2009 Keller Estate Riesling Trocken
Alright, there is likely some botrytis in this wine. The texture is too viscous, the flavors too ripe and spicy, for this not to be the case. Without a doubt, this wine was at its best for me on day one.
2009 Okonomierat Rebholz Riesling Trocken
My favorite. Compared with a few days ago, it opened up slightly, though not remarkably. Mineral, fresh, invigorating, decidedly dry, but balanced trocken Riesling.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment