Not to out him, or shame him, but Jim Barr, my (mostly) respectable colleague insists that his Sonoma (forget exactly where in Sonoma) Syrah grapes must be picked at 24 brix or above. That way, the seed is likely to be nice and brown, or "physiologically ripe." They have already achieved "sugar ripenes." That happens first in warmer, sunnier wine growing regions. California, even in the so-called cool, Type I climate growing zones, is a warmer, sunnier growing region. The harvest was 3-4 weeks later than usual, and the pH of the grapes around 3.40. All exciting things, says Barr.
Barr knows grapes, he knows winemaking and, occasionally, he even knows wine (joking, Jim). He has been making wine for around thirty years. He is also a creature of habit - to put it mildly - and I imagine that he looks for these indicators in his grapes year in, year out. However, I know for a fact that Barr really enjoys more moderate alcohol wines, Loire reds, for example. Nonetheless, he insists that if his grapes aren't "physiologically ripe," i.e. brown pips, his wines will not only be hard, but bitter as well.
I'm no winemaker. Never tried it. In fact, I might as well come clean and admit that I've never even helped to harvest. Hell, you know what, I just taste, spit and judge wine for a living professionally. I much prefer maker's and coke... All joking aside, I come across more and more California wines from growers who purposefully pick earlier than their neighbors (see Hirsch Pinot Noir in the Sonoma Coast). Another example would be the terrifically balanced, fresh tasting 2007 Bartolo Minerva, a southern France by-way-of Santa Clara County inspired blend of Mourvedre, Syrah and Grenache, all heat loving grapes that typically do need to be ripe enough so that they ferment to at least 14%...except this particular wine comes in at an amazingly low 12.5%! Both of these are examples of wines that I would say do show ripe phenolics (in other words, they come from physiologically ripe grapes) and do not show green, astringent tannins.
I know this topic is oft discussed, maybe people are sick of it, possibly rightfully so. But I'd like to ask a few winemakers some questions:
What's the lowest brix you think California Syrah can be picked at to taste good? How much earlier would you estimate the harvest date would be than that of Syrah picked at 24.5?
The lowest brix that southern Rhone or Languedoc-Roussillon syrah can be harvested to still be good? Northern Rhone? How ripe are Allemand's syrah grapes? What about Chave's? Guigal's La La syrah grapes?
For a great post on ripeness, with a similarly educational thread to match, might I suggest you check out this June 2009 post from the Brooklyn Guy.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
thanks for the kind shout out, old skool.
"pazzati"
Good blog topic, and one that does not have an easy answer . . .
I know of some syrah that is picked at 22 or 23 brix and produces nice wines . . . and I know of others that are picked at 26 or 27 and are still too green . . .
Brix is simply a number and not one to get too worked up about. I understand that if you see 28 brix, you'll think that the subsequent wine produced will be over 16% alcohol, but you and I know that most times, 'other methods' will be used to keep the alcohol levels at a 'tamer' level for the average consumer . . .
It is truly not easy to decide when to pick, but I do believe one must be pragmatic in your approach to this - if a given vintage gives you grapes that are 'ready' based on your definition of 'ready' at 23, go for it! But don't go by 'rote' and say that 'I can't pick yet because I NEVER pick under 26' . . .
Just another data point to add . . .
Cheers!
What TW said.
There are lots of numbers that are of interest in picking syrah; brix, gluc/fruc, pH, TA, etc. But its all about taste - no flavor, no good.
3.4 pH doesn't sound too bad to me.
Best, Jim
Post a Comment